Times Table - Learn Math

Analysis by Getfullapps

I found Times Table - Learn Math to be a straightforward educational game with one clear purpose: helping players practise multiplication through short, game-like activities. It is made by BrainSoft Apps, and I think its strongest quality is that it turns a skill many children find repetitive into something they can revisit without opening a workbook every time. The presentation is focused rather than overloaded, which makes it easy to understand from the first session.

The game is free to start and suitable for Everyone, so it can fit a family tablet, a child’s phone, or a quick practice session after school. It runs on Android 6.0 and later, and the current version is 2.1.9. I would not treat it as a complete mathematics course, but as a focused tool for building speed and confidence with multiplication facts, it has a sensible role.

How I use it for a dependable practice routine

My preferred way to use Times Table - Learn Math is in short sessions rather than one long attempt. I begin with a small target, such as practising one difficult multiplication family, and then play until I can answer without relying on slow counting. This approach matters because the game is most useful when it supports repeated recall, not when it becomes background entertainment.

The usual workflow is simple. I open the game, choose the available multiplication activity, and concentrate on answering accurately before trying to become faster. That order is important for younger learners. Speed can look impressive while hiding weak understanding, especially when a player guesses quickly and happens to get some answers right. I would first aim for reliable answers, then use later sessions to reduce hesitation.

A realistic everyday use case is a child who has ten minutes before dinner or while waiting for an appointment. Instead of asking for a full worksheet, a parent can let the child complete a compact practice session and then ask which facts felt difficult. That conversation gives the game more value: the screen supplies repetition, while the adult helps connect the answers to real learning.

I also like the idea of using it as a warm-up before homework. A few rounds can bring multiplication facts to the front of the mind before a child starts solving word problems or working with larger numbers. It will not teach every part of those problems, but stronger recall can remove one small obstacle when the exercise involves multiplication.

The game is especially suitable for learners who already recognise multiplication but need more fluency. If a child is still trying to understand what multiplication means, I would pair the app with objects, drawings, arrays, or spoken explanations. A game can reinforce a concept, but it should not be expected to replace the first explanation of equal groups or repeated addition.

What to do before chasing speed

I recommend keeping a small note of the facts that cause hesitation. For example, a learner might know the easy combinations but pause on a few less familiar ones. After a session, write down those troublesome facts and practise them away from the screen. The next time, the game becomes a check on progress rather than the only teaching method.

Another useful habit is to say the complete fact aloud. Instead of silently tapping an answer, the learner can say “six times seven is forty-two” before moving on. This adds a verbal memory route and makes it easier for a parent or teacher to notice whether the child understands the relationship or is simply guessing.

I would also avoid treating every mistake as a failure. The useful question is whether the same fact keeps causing trouble. A single error may be carelessness, while repeated hesitation points to a learning gap. Times Table - Learn Math works best when the player uses that feedback to choose what to review next.

Settings and choices worth checking

The first thing I would check is how the game presents its practice options. A learner should not automatically jump between every table if the goal is to improve a particular weakness. Focused practice is easier to evaluate because the player can tell whether a specific group of facts is becoming more familiar.

For a beginner, I would keep the session calm and allow time to think. For a learner who already knows the basics, I would use the game as a speed-and-accuracy check. The important setting is not a hidden trick; it is the way the player chooses a level of challenge that is demanding without becoming discouraging.

Because the game includes optional in-app purchases ranging from $0.99 to $19.99 per item, I would review the purchase controls before handing the device to a child. The base game is free, but a family should still know how optional spending is handled on its device. I would not let a child explore purchase screens unsupervised, even when the educational purpose is clear.

It is also worth checking whether the device is comfortable for the learner. A small phone screen may be perfectly adequate for a quick round, but a tablet can make the questions easier to read for younger children. That is not a feature of the game itself, yet it affects whether practice feels accessible or tiring.

I would keep notifications and distractions away from the session when possible. Multiplication practice depends on attention, and a child who keeps switching to other apps may confuse tapping activity with learning. A quiet place and a defined stopping point usually help more than extending the session.

Small patterns that make practice faster

Experienced users can make the game more effective by combining it with mental shortcuts. The nine-times table, for instance, can be connected to ten times a number minus that number. The seven-times table often becomes easier when broken into five times plus two times. These are not replacements for memorisation, but they give a learner a reliable route when an answer is not yet automatic.

Another helpful pattern is the commutative relationship: three times eight and eight times three have the same result. Once a learner understands that, one known fact can support another. I would use the game to identify which facts are slow, then use these relationships to reduce the number of completely separate facts the child must remember.

I also recommend grouping practice by difficulty rather than by a rigid idea that every table must receive identical attention. A learner may move quickly through familiar combinations but need extra time on particular products. Repeating easy questions can build confidence, yet spending the entire session on them creates a misleading sense of mastery.

A practical routine is to alternate focused and mixed practice. In one session, work on a narrow group of facts. In the next, include a broader selection so the learner has to recognise the correct operation without knowing what comes next. This prevents memory from becoming tied only to a predictable sequence.

For parents, the best shortcut is to ask for an explanation after a difficult answer. If the child says the answer and can describe how it was found, the learning is stronger than a correct tap alone. If the child cannot explain it, I would return to a visual or spoken example before demanding more speed in the game.

Where the game is genuinely useful

Its strongest use is repeated multiplication practice with low setup. There is no need to prepare cards, print worksheets, or invent questions. A learner can pick up the device and begin, which makes it easier to maintain a habit on busy days. That convenience is likely one reason the game has reached over ten million installs and holds a 4.5 average from around two hundred fifty-three thousand ratings.

I would recommend it to children who enjoy immediate interaction more than paper exercises. Some learners respond well to a game because the short challenges make practice feel less formal. It can also help adults who want a simple way to encourage daily repetition without turning every session into a correction-heavy lesson.

It may be useful for older learners who want a refresher, too. Someone returning to basic arithmetic can use short rounds to identify weak spots privately. The Everyone rating makes the game broadly approachable, though the actual benefit still depends on the player’s level and expectations.

The developer, BrainSoft Apps, has kept the concept narrow. I see that as a strength when the immediate goal is multiplication recall. A child does not have to navigate unrelated subjects before reaching the practice. On the other hand, the narrow focus means it should sit alongside other resources if the learner needs fractions, division, geometry, algebra, or detailed worked solutions.

Limits that matter before choosing it

The biggest limitation is that game-based repetition is not the same as full instruction. If a child repeatedly misses a fact, more rounds may not solve the problem. The learner may need counters, a number line, a multiplication chart, or an adult explanation. Times Table - Learn Math can provide practice opportunities, but I would not use it as the only response to persistent confusion.

Another limitation is the risk of confusing recognition with recall. If a player becomes familiar with the appearance or order of questions, performance may improve inside the game without transferring fully to homework. That is why I would occasionally ask the facts aloud or write a few on paper after playing.

The free entry point is convenient, but optional purchases deserve attention in a family setting. A parent who wants a completely purchase-free experience should check the device’s controls and decide whether the available free content is enough for the intended routine. The presence of paid items does not make the educational idea weaker, but it is part of the practical decision.

I would also skip this game if the learner needs rich explanations after every answer. A dedicated tutoring app, a teacher-led lesson, or a structured mathematics platform may be better for understanding why an answer works. This game is more convincing as a practice companion than as a replacement for instruction.

It is not the ideal choice for someone seeking a broad curriculum. The store summary focuses on learning times tables through math games, and that focus is reflected in my experience of its role. If your priority is multiplication fluency, the narrow design is helpful. If you want a complete set of school subjects, you will need another solution.

How it compares with familiar alternatives

Compared with flashcards, the game is easier to start and may feel more inviting to a child who resists paper drills. Flashcards are still excellent for deliberate recall because an adult can select exactly which facts appear and ask for explanations. I would use the game for motivation and repetition, then use cards or a notebook to test whether the skill transfers away from the screen.

Compared with a multiplication chart, it encourages active answering rather than simply looking up a result. A chart is better when a learner needs a visual reference or is first building an understanding of patterns. I would not remove the chart too early; it can support learning while the game gradually builds independence.

Compared with broad educational platforms, Times Table - Learn Math is less comprehensive but also less distracting. A large platform may provide lessons, videos, progress systems, and several subjects, while this game keeps attention on multiplication. For a child who needs one specific skill reinforced, that smaller scope can be an advantage.

Compared with timed worksheets, the game may reduce the feeling of a formal test, but paper remains useful for checking written accuracy and transfer. A child who performs well on screen but struggles to solve multiplication in a notebook needs a mixed routine, not simply more game rounds.

Building a repeatable mastery routine

I would use a three-part cycle. First, choose a focused group of multiplication facts. Second, play a short session with accuracy as the priority. Third, finish away from the device by answering a few of the same facts aloud or on paper. This final step is the part many families miss, and it helps reveal whether the improvement belongs to the learner rather than only to the game context.

After several sessions, change the order of practice. A learner who always studies tables in a familiar sequence may remember the rhythm rather than the individual facts. Mixed recall is more demanding, but it is closer to what happens in ordinary homework, where the next multiplication problem is not announced in advance.

I would keep the stopping rule simple: stop when attention drops, not when frustration has already taken over. Short, successful practice is easier to repeat the next day. The game’s free availability makes frequent use practical, but frequency should not become pressure. The goal is dependable recall, not the largest possible number of rounds.

For a parent or teacher, progress should be judged by several signs: fewer pauses, fewer repeated mistakes, better spoken explanations, and correct answers outside the app. A high in-game result is encouraging, but it is only one piece of evidence. This is a useful distinction when deciding whether to continue with the game or add a more explanatory resource.

My final recommendation

After using Times Table - Learn Math as a focused practice tool, I see it as a good fit for learners who need multiplication repetition and enjoy a game-like format. It is free to begin, broadly age-appropriate, and simple enough to include in a daily routine. Its large audience, with more than ten million installs and about one thousand two hundred written reviews, suggests that many people find the basic idea worthwhile.

My main recommendation is to treat it as a practice engine, not a complete teacher. Use it after the concept has been explained, combine it with mental strategies and occasional paper checks, and pay attention to the facts that remain difficult. That approach gets more value from the game than simply chasing faster taps.

I would recommend it to families wanting a convenient multiplication refresher, to children who respond positively to short challenges, and to adults who need an uncomplicated way to encourage repetition. I would choose a different or additional resource for learners who need step-by-step instruction, a full mathematics curriculum, or detailed feedback on every mistake.

In the end, the game succeeds because it stays focused. It will not solve every mathematics problem, and it should not be presented as though it will. Used with a sensible routine, however, it can make the most repetitive part of learning times tables easier to revisit, easier to discuss, and more likely to become automatic.

Read About Times Table - Learn Math in Your Language